Guide: HIRA in safety

HIRA: hazard identification and risk assessment, done properly

HIRA (hazard identification and risk assessment) is the structured way a plant finds what could hurt people in each task, rates how likely and how serious that harm is, and decides which controls bring the risk down to an acceptable level. It helps EHS heads, supervisors and maintenance teams in Indian and US plants turn safety judgment into a written, reviewable record.

By Jay SampatPublished Last reviewed 10 min read

likelihoodseveritybeforeafter controls

HIRA in safety: what it means in a plant

A hazard is anything that could cause harm: a rotating shaft, stored hydraulic pressure, a hot ladle, a solvent, a fall from a platform. Risk is the combination of how likely it is that someone is harmed and how serious that harm would be. The UK Health and Safety Executive puts it in one line: identify what could cause injury or illness, decide how likely it is that someone could be harmed and how seriously, then act to eliminate the hazard or control the risk.

HIRA is the name widely used for that process in Indian plants, and the name you will see in many EHS manuals, audit checklists and safety training courses. US plants usually call the same work a job hazard analysis or a risk assessment. The method is the same: break the work into activities, find the hazards in each, rate the risk, decide controls, and write it down so it can be checked and improved.

A good HIRA covers routine production work and the non-routine work where many serious incidents happen: maintenance, cleaning, changeovers, breakdown repair and contractor jobs. OSHA's recommended practices call out nonroutine tasks such as maintenance specifically, because they present hazards that normal operation does not.

The steps, from scope to review

Most procedures follow the same sequence, whether you work to HSE's five steps, OSHA's recommended practices or your own corporate standard.

  1. 01

    Define the scope and the team

    Pick an area, line or task. Include the people who do the work: operators, technicians and contractors know where the real hazards are.

  2. 02

    Break the work into activities

    List routine and non-routine activities, including start-up, shutdown, cleaning, maintenance and emergencies. Note who does each and how often.

  3. 03

    Identify the hazards in each activity

    Walk the area. Read equipment manuals, safety data sheets, inspection reports and past incident and near-miss records, as OSHA recommends. Ask the people doing the work what scares them.

  4. 04

    Rate the risk before controls

    Score likelihood and severity on your site's scale and combine them. This is the initial or inherent risk.

  5. 05

    Decide controls using the hierarchy

    Start with elimination and substitution, then engineering, then administrative controls, and use PPE last.

  6. 06

    Rate the residual risk

    Score the risk again assuming the controls are in place and working. Check it against your acceptability criteria.

  7. 07

    Record, assign and communicate

    Write the significant findings, give every new control an owner and a date, and brief the people who do the work.

  8. 08

    Review on a trigger and on a schedule

    Revisit after incidents, changes and on a fixed cycle. See the review triggers below.

The likelihood x severity matrix

Most sites use a 5 x 5 matrix. Likelihood and severity are each scored 1 to 5, and the risk score is the product. The descriptions below are an example; your site must define its own so that two assessors rate the same task the same way.

Example 5 x 5 risk matrix: score = likelihood x severity
Likelihood \ Severity1 Negligible2 Minor3 Moderate4 Major5 Catastrophic
5 Almost certain510152025
4 Likely48121620
3 Possible3691215
2 Unlikely246810
1 Rare12345

Example severity scale: 1 first aid only, 2 medical treatment, 3 lost-time injury, 4 permanent disability, 5 fatality. Example likelihood scale: 1 not expected in the life of the plant, 3 could happen in the next few years, 5 expected to happen often. Write your own scale with descriptions your supervisors recognize.

Risk bands and acceptability

The score only matters once you decide what each band means for action. A common convention for a 5 x 5 matrix is shown below. These bands are an example, not a legal threshold; your EHS head sets them and your management signs them off.

Example risk bands for a 5 x 5 matrix
ScoreBandWhat it means
1 to 4LowAcceptable. Keep existing controls and review on the normal cycle.
5 to 9MediumTolerable only if further reduction is not reasonably practicable. Controls must be in place and checked; supervisor sign-off.
10 to 16HighNot acceptable for routine work. Add controls before the task proceeds; senior sign-off for any interim arrangement.
20 to 25Very highStop. Do not start or continue the task until the risk is reduced.

A second rule many plants add: any hazard with a severity of 5 needs senior review, whatever the score. A rare but fatal hazard scores only 5, yet it deserves more attention than a likely paper cut.

requestassess,gas testissueworkhandbackcloseisolationno handback, no close
For non-routine work, the controls a HIRA calls for are often enforced through a permit and an isolation.

Rating a maintenance task

Worked example (illustrative)

Task: replace a leaking hydraulic hose on the HP-11 press (an illustrative machine). The team identifies three hazards and rates each before and after controls on the 5 x 5 matrix above.

Controls chosen: isolate the motor and bleed the accumulator under a lockout procedure (engineering and procedural), fit a mechanical ram block before reaching into the tool area (engineering), follow a written hose change procedure (administrative), and wear face shield and gloves (PPE). A drip tray and spill kit deal with the oil.

HazardInitial L x SInitial scoreResidual L x SResidual score
Injection injury from stored hydraulic pressure3 x 515 High1 x 55 Medium
Crush from ram descending under gravity2 x 510 High1 x 55 Medium
Slip on spilled oil3 x 26 Medium1 x 22 Low

The controls cut likelihood, not severity: if stored pressure is released into a hand, the injury is just as serious. Both severity 5 hazards stay in the medium band with senior review, which is the right answer. The next improvement is to engineer the hazard further, for example a permanent bleed-down valve and a fixed ram lock, rather than relying on people to remember a block.

The hierarchy of controls

OSHA's recommended practices tell employers to select controls according to a hierarchy that puts engineering solutions, including elimination and substitution, first, followed by safe work practices and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment last. The order matters because controls higher up work without relying on someone doing the right thing every time.

  1. Elimination. Remove the hazard. Example: relocate a grease point outside the guard so nobody has to reach in.
  2. Substitution. Replace it with something less hazardous. Example: a water-based cleaner instead of a flammable solvent.
  3. Engineering controls. Isolate people from the hazard. Examples: interlocked guards, local exhaust ventilation, a fixed energy isolation point that takes a lock.
  4. Administrative controls. Change how people work. Examples: procedures, permits to work, training, signage, job rotation.
  5. PPE. Protect the individual. Examples: gloves, face shields, harnesses, respirators. Necessary, but the last line.

Avoid controls that create new hazards

OSHA also asks employers to check that a control does not introduce a new hazard. A guard that has to be removed for every adjustment will be left off. A respirator that fogs a visor creates a vision hazard.

Residual risk and who accepts it

Residual risk is what is left once the controls are in place. It is never zero. The HIRA record should state the residual score, the band it falls in, and who accepted it. If the residual risk is still above your acceptable band, the task should not proceed as planned.

Residual risk is only as real as the controls behind it. A control written in the HIRA but not present on the floor gives a false score. That is why the HIRA should link to the procedures, permits, inspections and training records that prove each control exists.

When to review the assessment

HSE's guidance says controls must be reviewed to check they still work, especially when there are changes in staff, a process, the substances or equipment used, when workers have identified problems, and after accidents or near misses. OSHA recommends evaluating hazards before changing operations, workstations or workflow, making major organizational changes, or introducing new equipment, materials or processes.

  • An incident or near miss in the activity
  • A new or modified machine, tool, chemical or process
  • A change in layout, staffing or shift pattern
  • New legal requirements or a new internal standard
  • Inspection or audit findings that show a control is not working
  • Worker concerns raised about the task
  • The fixed review date, commonly once a year for high-risk activities

Indian and US context

India

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 consolidates central labor laws and repeals the Factories Act, 1948. Rules made under the repealed Acts stay in force where they do not conflict with the Code, until they are replaced, so check which rules your state has notified.

Section 6 of the Code requires every employer to keep the workplace free from hazards that cause or are likely to cause injury or occupational disease, and to provide plant and systems of work that are safe and without risk to health, along with the information, instruction, training and supervision employees need. For factories carrying on a hazardous process, Section 84 requires disclosure of information about dangers and the measures to overcome them, a detailed health and safety policy, and an on-site emergency plan approved by the Chief Inspector-cum-Facilitator.

The Code does not prescribe a single HIRA format. A documented HIRA is the practical way most plants show how they identified hazards and decided controls, and it is commonly expected in ISO 45001 management systems and customer audits.

United States

OSHA's Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs set out hazard identification and assessment as a core program element: collect existing information, inspect the workplace, identify health hazards, investigate incidents, plan for emergency and nonroutine work, and characterize and prioritize hazards by severity, likelihood and exposure. These are recommended practices rather than a single mandatory standard, but specific OSHA standards, such as the lockout/tagout standard, require controls that a good assessment will point to.

Where MaintenanceIQ fits

The EHS module in MaintenanceIQ is licensed and switched on per site. It includes a HIRA register that computes the risk score, assigns the band and acceptability, and records controls against the hierarchy of controls. The same module holds work permits with gas tests and named crew, lockout isolations with personal locks, incidents, and CAPA actions, so the controls a HIRA calls for can be traced to the records that show they happened.

Because the EHS registers sit beside maintenance work orders and machine history, a hazard found during a repair and the control that fixed it stay on the same record. See the EHS module for the full list of registers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the full form of HIRA?

HIRA stands for hazard identification and risk assessment. It is the process of finding hazards in each activity, rating their risk, and deciding controls.

What is the difference between a hazard and a risk?

A hazard is something that can cause harm, such as stored pressure or a hot surface. Risk is the combination of how likely harm is and how serious it would be. You identify hazards and assess risks.

Is HIRA mandatory in India?

The OSH Code 2020 places a duty on employers to keep the workplace free from hazards and to provide safe systems of work, and imposes extra duties on factories with hazardous processes. It does not name a single HIRA format, but a documented HIRA is the usual way plants show how they meet those duties. Check your state's rules and any conditions in your factory license.

Should we use a 3 x 3 or a 5 x 5 risk matrix?

A 5 x 5 matrix separates risks more finely and is common in manufacturing. A 3 x 3 matrix is quicker and can suit small sites. Whichever you use, define each level in words so different assessors give the same score.

How often should a HIRA be reviewed?

Review it after any incident or near miss, before any change to the process, equipment or materials, when workers raise concerns, and on a fixed cycle that your site sets, often yearly for high-risk activities.

Fix it before it fails.

Start a free trial today, or book a demo tailored to your plant, assets and standards.

Start with one line. Extend when it works.